Tesla's Shanghai "Workshop" went overseas in April with nearly 30,000 "electric horses", which can be considered a "leader" anywhere.
The overseas "foreign bloggers" also made a fuss, saying that the "renewed version" Model Y was first landed in Kangaroo Country and captured many "territories" in Asia.
This posture is like a "iron cavalry" made in China, traveling all over the world.
Don’t just be tempted by “Happiness”. If you think about it carefully, the taste is not that simple.
Take Kimchi Country for example. In the past, it was famous for "protecting calfs". Its own modern and Kia are the "meats in my heart".
As a result, Tesla has changed into a "vard" and transformed into a "Made in China". The sticks have become "very fragrant". The sales are like rockets, and they are whizzing upwards, an increase of 80% per year.
Are you a little "very scary" when you talk about this?
The "track" behind this is probably not explained by the failure of a sentence "patriotic sentiment".
To put it bluntly, people bought Tesla's "inside" - technology, design, and the spirit of "technology trendsetter".
As for where to "settle", it has become secondary.
This is like you "shopping" your Apple phone. Even though you know it is "produced by Foxconn", what you care about is Apple's "golden signboard", not Foxcon
Tesla's Shanghai "Workshop" went overseas in April with nearly 30,000 "electric horses", which can be considered a "leader" anywhere.
The overseas "foreign bloggers" also made a fuss, saying that the "renewed version" Model Y was first landed in Kangaroo Country and captured many "territories" in Asia.
This posture is like a "iron cavalry" made in China, traveling all over the world.
Don’t just be tempted by “Happiness”. If you think about it carefully, the taste is not that simple.
Take Kimchi Country for example. In the past, it was famous for "protecting calfs". Its own modern and Kia are the "meats in my heart".
As a result, Tesla has changed into a "vard" and transformed into a "Made in China". The sticks have become "very fragrant". The sales are like rockets, and they are whizzing upwards, an increase of 80% per year.
Are you a little "very scary" when you talk about this?
The "track" behind this is probably not explained by the failure of a sentence "patriotic sentiment".
To put it bluntly, people bought Tesla's "inside" - technology, design, and the spirit of "technology trendsetter".
As for where to "settle", it has become secondary.
This is like you "shopping" your Apple phone. Even though you know it is "produced by Foxconn", what you care about is Apple's "golden signboard", not Foxconn's "assembly line kung fu".
Of course, we cannot completely deny the progress of our "China Intelligent Manufacturing".
After all, the "output efficiency" and "quality control" of Shanghai's "workshop" are among the best in the world.
Being able to serve Tesla as the "picky ghost" comfortably means that our "craftsmanship" is superb.
But the problem is "about to come out".
Tesla "settled" in Shanghai, and then "exported to domestic sales". The "fat meat" in the middle still let Tesla "chew" away.
What we "digate" is more about "hard-for-hard-for-you money".
It's like working for "landlords and wealthy", who can make a living, but it's always "making wedding clothes for others."
So, should we "calculate" and how can we go from a "big manufacturer" to a "brand strong man"?
You can't always "relief on others" and watch others "count their votes"?
Now the domestic "new tram forces" are also beginning to "ready", such as BYD, NIO, and Xiaopeng, are all "made" with great success.
But compared to Tesla, there is still a "gaps".
This "gaps" is not only in terms of "hard power", but also in terms of "soft power" - brand awareness, marketing, and even corporate culture.
For example, Tesla's "catfish effect" has made domestic "tram manufacturers" feel "unprecedented" pressure, forcing them to "fight" and innovate.
This is of course a "merit".
But on the other hand, Tesla's "price butcher" strategy has also made some small factories "stay away", exacerbating the industry's "survival of the fittest".
The more "incisive" question is, is our definition of "success" too "one-sided"?
It seems that only "selling to the top" and "market value breaks" can be considered "success and fame".
But a "prosperous" society should allow "a hundred flowers to bloom". Even if they are "not rich", as long as they can provide "value for money" products and services, they should be "cared for".
When we focus our "eyes" on "dumbling Tesla", are we "losing our minds" and ignoring our own development?
The future of China's "tram world" should not be just a "showing a cat and drawing a tiger" Tesla's model, but a "find a different approach" and embarking on its own "broad road".
This path may pay more attention to "technical innovation", "user experience", and "social responsibility".
Back to the initial "talk", Tesla's Shanghai "workshop" export volume "set a new high", which is of course "good news".
But we cannot only see the "glory" on the surface, but also "spread the cocoon" and think about the "mystery" behind it.
It's like when you see someone "love the lottery", you will "envy" him for his good luck, but you should "ask yourself" how to live a better life through "down-to-earth", rather than pinning your hopes on the luck of "the moon and moon".
