At present, the technology and design are developing better. But job-hopping will be a little harder. After all, the job of the counterpart is not particularly easy to find. It takes a period of study to get started in different industries.
Quality job hopping is simpler. The quality system and quality management operations of each factory are similar, which means that the threshold is low. Cross-industry is also simpler.
What is the future of dry quality? Good work should be done, and if there is a problem, the quality control is not done well. In any link, any problem with any personnel can be attributed to the failure of quality control. The quality control is the first thing to do. Few people care about the issue of execution.
There are a few leaders who know that it is a problem of execution, how can they be improved? fine. Who will be fined? Those who care about quality should be investigated, and whoever is responsible will be punished. However, the product is the result of multiple processes. Quality problems cannot be black and white, and quite a number of quality problems that have occurred cannot be traced back. It is difficult to find out which link is the problem without spending high inspection costs. If someone tops the package, then there will be two results:
The first result was that all the relevant personnel played 50 boards each. The result was that all the relevant people were offended. Fortunately, there was a group of people tied up, including yourself.
The second result is to punish the people who are mo
At present, the technology and design are developing better. But job-hopping will be a little harder. After all, the job of the counterpart is not particularly easy to find. It takes a period of study to get started in different industries.
Quality job hopping is simpler. The quality system and quality management operations of each factory are similar, which means that the threshold is low. Cross-industry is also simpler.
What is the future of dry quality? Good work should be done, and if there is a problem, the quality control is not done well. In any link, any problem with any personnel can be attributed to the failure of quality control. The quality control is the first thing to do. Few people care about the issue of execution.
There are a few leaders who know that it is a problem of execution, how can they be improved? fine. Who will be fined? Those who care about quality should be investigated, and whoever is responsible will be punished. However, the product is the result of multiple processes. Quality problems cannot be black and white, and quite a number of quality problems that have occurred cannot be traced back. It is difficult to find out which link is the problem without spending high inspection costs. If someone tops the package, then there will be two results:
The first result was that all the relevant personnel played 50 boards each. The result was that all the relevant people were offended. Fortunately, there was a group of people tied up, including yourself.
The second result is to punish the people who are most likely to have problems. The result is usually that the real responsible person laughs aside, and the punished person is dissatisfied and completely offends the person to death.
Then the so-called quality survey is to choose one of the two under the premise of being able to make a difference.
Generally speaking, in a company, those who are in charge of production are covered by the production boss, and there is no credit or hard work. They belong to the poorest group; those who are in charge of technology are covered by the chief engineer. Forced group; in theory, the quality of control is covered by the general manager, but in fact, no one is covered. It belongs to the most difficult group caught in the middle.
Most of the early quality system auditors were from quality backgrounds, and there are several who are familiar with meCarThe former quality manager of the main factory. Why did they come out for certification? It’s not because of quality that offends people and can’t get into the management team. It’s also a middle-level team in the original unit.
This is the so-called "doing one line and hating one line".
Finally, let me talk about the most dumbfounding thing I have experienced:
The company has an important project and has carried out quality planning, which specifies in detail which are the key components and which size records should be made. This plan is prepared by the Quality Department, reviewed by the Technical Department, Production Department, and Chief Engineer, and passed the review meeting unanimously. However, after the product was delivered, the problematic parts were not identified in this planning scheme, and there was no detailed dimensional record, only records of qualified batches. Moreover, the main reason for the problem is that the designed welding strength is not enough, which is a problem of the technical department. The chief engineer is really awesome, and the first one to ask the question is where is the quality record? I said that there are only records of qualified batches, and no records of specific dimensions. The chief engineer immediately said that you don’t keep records of such an important part and what you are doing.
I said in my heart, why didn't we find that there was a problem with the strength during the design review, and why we didn't mention that this place needs special attention during the quality planning.
I quickly assessed in my heart that these words could not be said, and if they were spoken directly in the face of the chief worker, I estimated that I would have to resign. If you don't say it, everyone knows it well. In order to ensure that everyone knows what is going on, I still mentioned that this part is not identified in the quality plan. On the surface, the quality plan is compiled by us, which means that we admit the error. In fact, it implies that there is a problem with the quality plan review, which is a silent counterattack. In the end, due to the chief engineer, no one was held accountable for this matter.
