Have you heard such a voice: "Please get off the car and check the vehicle's condition bypassing the car." Most people will only walk on a circle mechanically. In fact, that circle may be more fatal than your practice this month. The subject three exam site is not as romantic as you imagined as a lone hero who passes the level. It is more of a group of nervous people who are doing things that seem simple but will be "tied up" on the side of a straight road. In the sun, the security officer was holding a notebook with a stern face. Your feet just touched the cement floor, and your mind has begun to think about whether you can finish work normally today or become the protagonist of the next story on the list of failed exams.
Some people like to give themselves psychological massage before the exam: "What's the difficulty? I've been practicing for almost half a year, which movement can't be done?" Unfortunately, subject 3 likes to "stuck" people in details. Your exam is not just a technical competition, but more like walking a tightrope in a huge spider web. The movements you think are familiar with will be broken by nervousness on the spot: seat belts, lights, steering wheels, observations, and any of them can become a small peak in failure.
The facts are presented - Recently, a young man performed "all-round players" throughout the whole process. He drove steadily like an old dog and played the steering wheel more professionally than the coach. As a result, when he was parked at the end, he forgot to look back and observe, the safety officer calmly pressed the brakes, and he didn't even have the chance to "do it again". You can ask him: Have you practiced simulation? Have you also developed a habit on the road? As a result, I lost in a short-term negligence. This is the third subject: you think it is a "road test", but it is actually a "psychological war".
From the perspective of bystanders, all stories that fail the exam a
Have you heard such a voice: "Please get off the car and check the vehicle's condition bypassing the car." Most people will only walk on a circle mechanically. In fact, that circle may be more fatal than your practice this month. The subject three exam site is not as romantic as you imagined as a lone hero who passes the level. It is more of a group of nervous people who are doing things that seem simple but will be "tied up" on the side of a straight road. In the sun, the security officer was holding a notebook with a stern face. Your feet just touched the cement floor, and your mind has begun to think about whether you can finish work normally today or become the protagonist of the next story on the list of failed exams.
Some people like to give themselves psychological massage before the exam: "What's the difficulty? I've been practicing for almost half a year, which movement can't be done?" Unfortunately, subject 3 likes to "stuck" people in details. Your exam is not just a technical competition, but more like walking a tightrope in a huge spider web. The movements you think are familiar with will be broken by nervousness on the spot: seat belts, lights, steering wheels, observations, and any of them can become a small peak in failure.
The facts are presented - Recently, a young man performed "all-round players" throughout the whole process. He drove steadily like an old dog and played the steering wheel more professionally than the coach. As a result, when he was parked at the end, he forgot to look back and observe, the safety officer calmly pressed the brakes, and he didn't even have the chance to "do it again". You can ask him: Have you practiced simulation? Have you also developed a habit on the road? As a result, I lost in a short-term negligence. This is the third subject: you think it is a "road test", but it is actually a "psychological war".
From the perspective of bystanders, all stories that fail the exam are like a detective film. Before starting, you have to walk around the car counterclockwise, not to join in the fun, but to check for omissions and fill in the gaps - some students on the scene were directly terminated because they did not take the car. I wore the seat belt countless times, but I forgot when I really started and was sentenced to fail. Simulating the lighting, the examiner hasn't finished his words, and you rush to move, which can be considered as "breaking your own way of life" in advance. Turn signal, have you turned on for more than 3 seconds? No problem, the machine determines that you are too anxious and will directly deduct points. The vehicle goes off the wrong way, but it seems that it is okay, but in fact the safety officer's heartbeats faster than you, and he is ready to step on the "end button" at any time. There are also observations, parking on the side, slowing down at intersections, etc. Every detail is waiting for you to "take careless".
Are these mistakes too outrageous? In fact, it is very consistent with human nature. Under pressure, people are always prone to ignore small actions that they usually feel are indifferent. During my driving test, the most bizarre failure I have ever seen is not because my skills are not up to standard, but because I am reluctant to lose because of my mental care. For example, if you think "stepping on the brakes at the intersection" is just a mechanical action, it is actually testing your active risk control; if you think "look back" is a performance, it is actually a way to make life and responsibility go hand in hand.
What is the difficulty of science three? It is not difficult to operate, but the difficulty lies in whether you can habituate a series of trivial but extremely important small movements so that you can "complete automatically" even if you are taken to the exam room at 3 a.m. This does not mean that every candidate should have obsessive-compulsive disorder, but that every rule in a professional exam is written with countless stories of blood and pain. The reason why seat belts become "failed" is not because they are fragile, but because you may really tie your life to the line of failure in the exam.
When it comes to command operations, many people are like waiting for a bus, afraid of missing that bus, so they snatch the action in advance. As a result, the examination machine is even more ruthless than you - they only recognize the program, not the human nature. Simulating the light, before the examiner finished speaking, you already reacted, like an athlete who started early, and ended up watching others running towards the finish line.
To be a professional self-deprecating, the "standard driving test process" set by the Ministry of Public Security sometimes looks like holding a magnifying glass to criticize everyone's faults, and no one can escape it. You say the exam is too strict, but every overlooked small link is often the last second that the safety officer can never give a point. This is the reality. During the exam, you feel that you are the Holmes of that year. In fact, you are just grasping every flaw in the question. No one can truly "free from the whole process."
Observing actions is the most likely link to break the defense. The examiner will not remind you to "look back" every time, but if you keep leaning against the rearview mirror, only the brakes of the safety officer can remind you that the world is "not just the safety in the mirror." This reminds me of an old classmate who made a bold statement before the exam: "I practice more well than the coach." After three seconds, I failed the subject because I didn't look back. Think about it, this exam is about your habits, not whether you will "press the line".
Many people think it is simple to park on the side of the road. After all, I have parked a thousand times on the side of the road, but the edge line in the examination room is not the cement crack at the door of your house. Once you press it, it becomes a big killer. 30 cm, no more or less, it has a taste of precision that makes people doubt life. Most of the memories of the loser were shattered at this moment: "The coach wasn't that strict!" The exam was not your coach, but a practical battle.
There is also the classic intersection slowdown: getting used to relaxing without prompts, and once you ignore the exam room, you will be "exited with a full vote". Each process is not to make things difficult for you, but to avoid being "failed" by reality one day because of the same habits in the future. Sometimes I feel that these processes are like "ultrasounding ritual", but at the accident scenes I have seen, those ignored links are always the only ones that can be characterized as "avoidable mistakes" afterwards.
After all, subject 3 is not to train your veteran driver’s instinct, but to educate you to live a little longer than others on the road. The details of the failure today may be a life-saving revolution tomorrow. Habits and discipline are ultimately exchanged for failures.
After a calm analysis, this exam is more like a "behavioral test" under extreme conditions. You are not vaulting the steering wheel pole, but racing against your own heartbeat. Can you develop a habit and turn details into automation? The examiner is actually just watching, you are the protagonist. Are you willing to turn every detail that is prone to failing the subject into the basic qualities of future driving?
If it were you, which detail would you fall into? Or do you think these links of Subject 3 are really "necessary dogmas" or "extra shackles"? Life on the wheel, details determine success or failure. What would you choose?
We strictly abide by national laws and regulations and adhere to the correct public opinion orientation. If there is any need for content adjustment, please provide a basis for handling in accordance with the law. It is not easy for the editor to write articles. I hope everyone will leave more messages, likes and follow them. The editor will work harder and wish you a prosperous life.
